Sunday, March 31, 2013

UFO and LOGIC


Logic bases rational thinking in three fundamental laws:
The Law of Identity
The Law of Non-Contradiction
The Law of Excluded Middle
     The law of identity states that A is A. An Apple is an Apple. In other words, something is what it is. If something exists, it has a nature, an essence. For example, a book has a front and back cover with pages. A car has four wheels, seats, doors, windows, etc. A tree has branches, leaves, a trunk, and roots.  This also means that anything that exists has characteristics.  We recognize what something is by observing its characteristics.  
     Furthermore, if something has an identity, it has a single identity. It does not have more than one identity.  In other words, if something exists it has a set of attributes that are consistent with its own existence. 
Now, let’s consider those entities called Unidentified Flying Objects. The definition itself tells us that these objects cannot be identified by their characteristics. UFOs show different sizes and move in a non-conventional way, so it is in fact problematic to define UFOs as objects, but we have no other way to define this phenomenon.
    However, the law of non-contradiction tells us that A cannot be both A and not A at the same time and in the same sense. In other words, something (a statement) cannot be both true and false at the same time and in the same way. We use the law of non-contradiction constantly in discussions and debates because we are naturally able to recognize when someone is contradicting himself. A contradiction occurs when one statement excludes the possibility of another and yet both are claimed to be true. Since we know that both cannot be true, we see a contradiction.  From this principle, we can conclude that truth is not self-contradictory. This is a very important concept because systematically, the UFO fantasists incur in this contradiction. For them and their followers, UFOs are also extraterrestrial crafts.   In this case, these mysterious objects are both identified and unidentified, and as we said A cannot be A and not A.
   The law of excluded middle confirms that that a statement is either true or false. There is no in-between in Logic, so Unidentified Flying Objects cannot be UFOs and also Extraterrestrial Crafts, because if the last statement is true, the definition of Unidentified Flying Objects has no meaning at all.
Now, since we cannot probe that UFOs are Extraterrestrial vehicles, UFOs remain unidentified and it is irrational and fallacious to use a contradictory double definition for the same phenomenon which remains unidentified until now. 

Fwd: Archons Denial



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <archons@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Subject: Archons Denial
To: fso2604@gmail.com


We are the protectors of intelligent life and not fallen entities from the alternative dark worlds.
It is however true that we control the Gate that gives access to this Universe, and sometimes we, Archons, authorize the Redeemed few to come into this Universe.
Nor is true that we feed on negative energies.
Humans should consider that there is only one kind of possible friendly contact between us and them.  This contact is based on negotiations, since we have much to give and few needs.
It is true: our voices sometimes can be listen by your minds, but our messages are practical and never self-destructive.
Think about this.
Athoth.
Eloaios.
Astaphaios.
Yao.
Sabaoth.
Adonin.
Sabbataios.

Wo ulo dho kladoddalk ad avdorrakovd rado uvk vad durrov ovdadaok dlan dho urdolvudaxo kulk valrkk. <br />Id ak havoxol dlio dhud vo davdlar dho Gudo dhud kaxok uddokk da dhak Uvaxolko, uvk kanodanok vo, Aldhavk, uidhalano dho Rokoonok dov da dano avda dhak Uvaxolko. <br />Nal ak dlio dhud vo dook av vokudaxo ovolkaok. <br />Hinuvk khairk davkakol dhud dholo ak avrav avo kavk ad kakkakro dlaovkrav davdudd kodvoov ik uvk dhon. Thak davdudd ak kukok av vokadaudaavk, kavdo vo huxo nidh da kaxo uvk dov vookk. <br />Id ak dlio: ail xaadok kanodanok duv ko rakdov kav avail navkk, kid ail nokkukok ulo kluddadur uvk voxol kord-kokdliddaxo. <br />Thavk ukaid dhak. <br />Adhadh. <br />Erauaak. <br />Akdukhuaak. <br />Yua. <br />Sukuadh. <br />Akavav. <br />Sukkuduaak. <br />



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 22, 2013

UFO, Induction and Deduction.


Inductive vs. deductive reasoning
Unlike deductive arguments, inductive reasoning allows for the possibility that the conclusion is false, even if all of the premises are true. Instead of being valid or invalid, inductive arguments are either strong or weak, which describes how probable it is that the conclusion is true.
A classical example of an incorrect inductive argument was presented by John Vickers:
All of the swans we have seen are white.
Therefore, all swans are white.
Now, let us see what we will call the UFO inductive reasoning:
Most of the so called Unidentified Flying Objects ( UFO) are identified as natural phenomena and /or human made artifacts.
Some of the UFO however, remain not identified, consequently these Unidentified Flying Objects are extraterrestrial vehicles.
As we can see this inductive argument allows the possibility that the conclusion is false. That is why Inductive reasoning is also known as hypothesis construction. The conclusion is unreliable so at most we can talk about a hypothetical conclusion, but not a factual one.
David Hume, the Scottish philosopher; described the problems of inductive reasoning in his  An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding,  based on his epistemological framework. Here, "reason" refers only to deductive reasoning and "induction" refers to inductive reasoning.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

You can change the world.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <in.chaos.we.trust@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM
Subject: You can change the world.
To: fso2604@gmail.com


In fact YOU can change things. Read again our post about the Butterfly event.
Small events, (particularly those who are unpredictable) will perhaps produce the butterfly effect that is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state.
So, truth is that you can change the world.
Think about this, because perhaps you will agree with us that this world deserves to be changed.
Fraternally
I.C.W.T
in.chaos.we.trust@nyms.net



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 15, 2013

Fwd: Try some "Butterfly Effect" ..!



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <in.chaos.we.trust@nyms.net>
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Subject: Try some "Butterfly Effect" ..!
To: fso2604@gmail.com


In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state. The name of the effect, coined by Edward Lorenz, is derived from the theoretical example of a hurricane's formation being contingent on whether or not a distant butterfly had flapped its wings several weeks before.
Although the butterfly effect may appear to be an esoteric and unlikely behavior, it is exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill may roll into any of several valleys depending on, among other things, slight differences in initial position.
The butterfly effect is a common trope in fiction when presenting scenarios involving time travel and with hypotheses where one storyline diverges at the moment of a seemingly minor event resulting in two significantly different outcomes.
Snowball effect is a figurative term for a process that starts from an initial state of small significance and builds upon itself, becoming larger (graver, more serious), and also perhaps potentially dangerous or disastrous (a vicious circle, a "spiral of decline"), though it might be beneficial instead (a virtuous circle). This is a very common cliché in cartoons and modern theatrics and it is also used in Psychology.
The common analogy is with the rolling of a small ball of snow down a snow-covered hillside. As it rolls the ball will pick up more snow, gaining more mass and surface area, and picking up even more snow and momentum as it rolls along.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_effect



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

How produce UFO sightings and other paranormal factoids.

The observer-expectancy effect (also called the experimenter-expectancy effect, expectancy bias, observer effect, or experimenter effect) is a form of reactivity in which a researcher's cognitive bias causes them to unconsciously influence the participants of an experiment. It is a significant threat to a study's internal validity, and is therefore typically controlled using a double-blind experimental design. An example of the observer-expectancy effect is demonstrated in music backmasking, in which hidden verbal messages are said to be audible when a recording is played backwards. Some people expect to hear hidden messages when reversing songs, and therefore hear the messages, but to others it sounds like nothing more than random sounds. Often when a song is played backwards, a listener will fail to notice the "hidden" lyrics until they are explicitly pointed out, after which they are obvious. Other prominent examples include facilitated communication and dowsing.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

CHAOS: Food for Thought



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <twilight.garden.circle@nyms.net>
Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:44 PM
Subject: CHAOS
To: fso2604@gmail.com



Chaos theory is the study of nonlinear dynamics, in which seemingly random events are actually predictable from simple deterministic equations.
 In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable.
This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos.
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state. The name of the effect, coined by Edward Lorenz, is derived from the theoretical example of a hurricane's formation being contingent on whether or not a distant butterfly had flapped its wings several weeks before.
The butterfly effect is exhibited by very simple systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill may roll into any of several valleys depending on, among other things, slight differences in initial position.
A chain reaction is a sequence of reactions where a reactive product or by-product causes additional reactions to take place. In a chain reaction, positive feedback leads to a self-amplifying chain of events.
Chain reactions are one way in which systems which are in thermodynamic non-equilibrium can release energy or increase entropy in order to reach a state of higher entropy. For example, a system may not be able to reach a lower energy state by releasing energy into the environment, because it is hindered in some way from taking the path that will result in the energy release. If a reaction results in a small energy release making way for more energy releases in an expanding chain, then the system will typically collapse explosively until much or all of the stored energy has been released.
A metaphor for chain reactions is thus a snowball causing larger snowfall until finally an avalanche results ("snowball effect"). This is a result of stored gravitational potential energy seeking a path of release over friction.
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.
Can be roughly grouped into three types:
A positive, unexpected benefit (usually referred to as luck, serendipity or a windfall).
A negative, unexpected detriment occurring in addition to the desired effect of the policy
A perverse effect contrary to what was originally intended (when an intended solution makes a problem worse), such as when a policy has a perverse incentive that causes actions opposite to what was intended.
Possible causes of unintended consequences include the world's inherent complexity (parts of a system responding to changes in the environment), perverse incentives, human stupidity, self-deception, failure to account for human nature or other cognitive or emotional biases.
As a sub-component of complexity, the chaotic nature of the universe—and especially its quality of having small, apparently insignificant changes with far-reaching effects (e.g., the butterfly effect)—applies.

T.G.C



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

UFO Sightings: NO proof of aliens' existence.



UFO sightings no proof of aliens existence
Northern Voices Online
Experts are of the opinion that numerous UFO sightings are really no proof
of aliens existence in our world. More so when we don't have any conclusive
evidence of a UFO being closely seen by a group of people in any industrial
nation. Aliens might not ...



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

UFO sightings no proof of aliens existence.

Northern Voices Online Experts are of the opinion that numerous UFO sightings are really no proof of aliens existence in our world. More so when we don't have any conclusive evidence of a UFO being closely seen by a group of people in any industrial nation. Aliens might not ...

Monday, March 4, 2013

UFO or Killing Robots?

** Robot warriors: Lethal machines coming of age **
Engineers are designing robots that will kill on future battlefields without human intervention - and the ethics are being hotly debated.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/news/magazine-21576376 >


--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 1, 2013

What's going on with the Basiago-Webre team?

This is what "time travel", "exopolitics" and similar inventions do to people...

Andrew Basiago Is Unfit For The U.S. Presidency - YouTube
He has been abusive and threatening. He has a history of verbally abusing
people on the telephone and email. Andrew is unfit to be elected U.S.
President.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO1OK-Mb7ms&feature=youtube_gdata






--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/criticalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/
Ufology, Exopolitics, Conspiracies, Paranoia, Memes, Hoaxes, 2012, UFO, Aliens, Disinformation, Cultism, Brainwashing, Rational Thinking, ET, Xenopolitics, Contactees, Abductions, Disclosure.
Powered By Blogger

Contributors